Conceptual Role Expressivism and Defective Concepts

In Oxford Studies in Metaethics 17 (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This paper examines the general prospects for conceptual role expressivism, expressivist theories that embrace conceptual role semantics. It has two main aims. The first aim is to provide a general characterisation of the view. The second aim is to raise a challenge for the general view. The challenge is to explain why normative concepts are not a species of defective concepts, where defective concepts are those that cannot meaningfully embed and participate in genuine inference. After rejecting existing attempts to answer the challenge, I propose an alternative solution. However, the solution leaves conceptual role expressivism a far less distinctive and interesting position than its proponents claim. I conclude that we should be sceptical about how much expressivists gain by appealing to conceptual role semantics.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BROCRE-5
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-06-02
View other versions
Added to PP index
2021-06-02

Total views
65 ( #52,677 of 64,083 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
65 ( #10,957 of 64,083 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.