Problems with the Dispositional Tracking Theory of Knowledge

Logos and Episteme 3 (3):505-507 (2012)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Rachael Briggs and Daniel Nolan attempt to improve on Nozick’s tracking theory of knowledge by providing a modified, dispositional tracking theory. The dispositional theory, however, faces more problems than those previously noted by John Turri. First, it is not simply that satisfaction of the theory’s conditions is unnecessary for knowledge – it is insufficient as well. Second, in one important respect, the dispositional theory is a step backwards relative to the original tracking theory: the original but not the dispositional theory can avoid Gettier-style counterexamples. Future attempts to improve the tracking theory would be wise to bear these problems in mind.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2012-04-02
Latest version: 4 (2018-12-02)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Mad, Bad and Dangerous to Know.Briggs, Rachael & Nolan, Daniel

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
376 ( #7,872 of 40,626 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
32 ( #18,128 of 40,626 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.