Effective Altruism and Systemic Change

Utilitas 31 (3):262-276 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
One of the main objections against effective altruism is the so-called institutional critique, according to which the EA movement neglects interventions that affect large-scale institutions. Alexander Dietz has recently put forward an interesting version of this critique, based on a theoretical problem affecting act-utilitarianism, which he deems as potentially conclusive against effective altruism. In this article I argue that his critique is not as promising as it seems. I then go on to propose another version of the institutional critique. In contrast to Dietz's version, it targets not the core principles of effective altruism but rather some important methodological assumptions made in EA research, namely diminishing marginal returns and low-hanging fruits. One key conclusion is that it may be time for critics of effective altruism to shift their attention from the theoretical core principles of effective altruism towards the methodological tools actually employed in practice by the EA movement.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BROEAA-7
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-07-16
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-06-21

Total views
191 ( #25,022 of 54,379 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
46 ( #15,076 of 54,379 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.