The Two-Dimensional Argument Against Dualism

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
At this point in time the two-dimensional (2D) argument against physicalism is well known (Chalmers 2009; 2010), as are the many responses to it. However there has been a recent development that has yet to be widely discussed. Some philosophers have argued that we have equally compelling reasons to think that dualism is false based on the conceivability of mere physical duplicates which enjoy conscious experience in just the way we do (Martin 1998; Sturgeon 2000; Piccinini 2006; Frankish 2007; Brown 2010; Balog MS). This argument has not yet been properly understood and in this paper I aim to correct the most common misunderstandings.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BROTTA-6
Revision history
First archival date: 2013-01-31
Latest version: 5 (2013-10-30)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-01-31

Total views
539 ( #4,439 of 39,619 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
38 ( #12,753 of 39,619 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.