Revisiting Risk and Rationality: a reply to Pettigrew and Briggs

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 45 (5):841-862 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX


I have claimed that risk-weighted expected utility maximizers are rational, and that their preferences cannot be captured by expected utility theory. Richard Pettigrew and Rachael Briggs have recently challenged these claims. Both authors argue that only EU-maximizers are rational. In addition, Pettigrew argues that the preferences of REU-maximizers can indeed be captured by EU theory, and Briggs argues that REU-maximizers lose a valuable tool for simplifying their decision problems. I hold that their arguments do not succeed and that my original claims still stand. However, their arguments do highlight some costs of REU theory

Author's Profile

Lara Buchak
Princeton University


Added to PP

809 (#13,035)

6 months
81 (#30,187)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?