Classical and revisionary theism on the divine as personal: a rapprochement?

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
To claim that the divine is a person or personal is, according to Swinburne, ‘the most elementary claim of theism’. I argue that, whether the classical theist’s concept of the divine as a person or personal is construed as an analogy or a metaphor, or a combination of the two, analysis necessitates qualification of that concept such that any differences between the classical theist’s concept of the divine as a person or personal and revisionary interpretations of that concept are merely superficial. Thus, either the classical theist has more in common with revisionary theism than he/she might care to admit, or classical theism is a multi-faceted position which encompasses interpretations which some might regard as revisionist. This article also explores and employs the use of a gender-neutral pronoun in talk about God.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BURCAR
Upload history
Archival date: 2015-12-22
View other versions
Added to PP index
2014-12-19

Total views
183 ( #28,384 of 58,204 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #45,003 of 58,204 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.