‘Ontological’ arguments from experience: Daniel A. Dombrowski, Iris Murdoch, and the nature of divine reality

Religious Studies 49 (4):459-480 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Dombrowski and Murdoch offer versions of the ontological argument which aim to avoid two types of objection – those concerned with the nature of the divine, and those concerned with the move from an abstract concept to a mind-independent reality. For both, the nature of the concept of God/Good entails its instantiation, and both supply a supporting argument from experience. It is only Murdoch who successfully negotiates the transition from an abstract concept to the instantiation of that concept, however, and this is achieved by means of an ontological argument from moral experience which, in a reversal of the Kantian doctrine, depends ultimately on a form of the cosmological argument.
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BUROAF
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-12-22
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Philosophical Investigations.Wittgenstein, Ludwig
Metaphors We Live By.Lakoff, George & Johnson, Mark

View all 58 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2013-12-01

Total views
343 ( #13,026 of 50,265 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
51 ( #11,313 of 50,265 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.