Verbal Sparring and Apologetic Points: Politeness in Gendered Argumentation Contexts

Informal Logic 30 (3):235-262 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay argues that ideals of cooperation or adversariality in argumentation are not equally attainable for women. Women in argumentation contexts face oppressive limitations undermining argument success because their authority is undermined by gendered norms of politeness. Women endorsing or, alternatively, transgressing feminine norms of politeness typically defend their authority in argumentation contexts. And yet, defending authority renders it less legitimate. My argument focuses on women in philosophy but bears the implication that other masculine dis- course contexts present similar double binds that urge social and political change.

Author's Profile

Sylvia Burrow
University of Western Ontario

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-02

Downloads
879 (#7,749)

6 months
45 (#21,825)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?