Where the conflict really lies: Plantinga, the challenge of evil, and religious naturalism

Philosophia Reformata 79 (1):66-82 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this paper I argue that, although Alvin Plantinga’s Felix Culpa theodicy appears on only two pages of his recent book Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion and Naturalism (2011) (i.e. 58-59), it is of pivotal importance for the book as a whole. Plantinga argues that there is superficial conflict but deep concord between science and monotheism, and that there is superficial concord but deep conflict between science and naturalism. I contend that the weakness of the Felix Culpa theodicy lends support to the view that there is more than superficial conflict between science and monotheism, and offer an alternative response to the challenge of evil which suggests that there might be, after all, concord between science and (religious) naturalism.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BURWTC
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-02-13
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-06-30

Total views
86 ( #24,394 of 39,026 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
23 ( #18,469 of 39,026 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.