Looking for Middle Ground in Cultural Attraction Theory

Evolutionary Anthropology 28 (1):14-17 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In their article, Thom Scott‐Phillips, Stefaan Blancke, and Christophe Heintz do a commendable job summarizing the position and misunderstandings of “cultural attraction theory” (CAT). However, they do not address a longstanding problem for the CAT framework; that while it has an encompassing theory and some well‐worked out case studies, it lacks tools for generating models or empirical hypotheses of intermediate generality. I suggest that what the authors diagnose as misunderstandings are instead superficial interpretive errors, resulting from researchers who have attempted to extract generalizable hypotheses from CAT and bring them into contact with the analytical and inferential models of contemporary cultural evolutionary research.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BUSLFM
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-02-04
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-02-04

Total views
106 ( #40,541 of 2,432,203 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
16 ( #39,086 of 2,432,203 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.