Looking for Middle Ground in Cultural Attraction Theory

Evolutionary Anthropology 28 (1):14-17 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In their article, Thom Scott‐Phillips, Stefaan Blancke, and Christophe Heintz do a commendable job summarizing the position and misunderstandings of “cultural attraction theory” (CAT). However, they do not address a longstanding problem for the CAT framework; that while it has an encompassing theory and some well‐worked out case studies, it lacks tools for generating models or empirical hypotheses of intermediate generality. I suggest that what the authors diagnose as misunderstandings are instead superficial interpretive errors, resulting from researchers who have attempted to extract generalizable hypotheses from CAT and bring them into contact with the analytical and inferential models of contemporary cultural evolutionary research.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
BUSLFM
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-02-04
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-02-04

Total views
31 ( #35,231 of 39,984 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
31 ( #16,956 of 39,984 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.