Interacting mindreaders

Philosophical Studies 165 (3):841-863 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Could interacting mindreaders be in a position to know things which they would be unable to know if they were manifestly passive observers? This paper argues that they could. Mindreading is sometimes reciprocal: the mindreader’s target reciprocates by taking the mindreader as a target for mindreading. The paper explains how such reciprocity can significantly narrow the range of possible interpretations of behaviour where mindreaders are, or appear to be, in a position to interact. A consequence is that revisions and extensions are needed to standard theories of the evidential basis of mindreading. The view also has consequences for understanding how abilities to interact combined with comparatively simple forms of mindreading may explain the emergence, in evolution or development, of sophisticated forms of social cognition
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2012-06-20
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
False-Belief Understanding in Infants.Baillargeon, Renée; Scott, Rose M. & He, Zijing

View all 40 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Social Cognition in the We-Mode.Gallotti, Mattia & Frith, Chris D.
Alignment in Social Interactions.Gallotti, Mattia; Fairhurst, M. T. & Frith, C. D.

View all 14 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
429 ( #9,946 of 50,117 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
46 ( #13,129 of 50,117 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.