The Metamathematics of Putnam’s Model-Theoretic Arguments

Erkenntnis 74 (3):321-349 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Putnam famously attempted to use model theory to draw metaphysical conclusions. His Skolemisation argument sought to show metaphysical realists that their favourite theories have countable models. His permutation argument sought to show that they have permuted models. His constructivisation argument sought to show that any empirical evidence is compatible with the Axiom of Constructibility. Here, I examine the metamathematics of all three model-theoretic arguments, and I argue against Bays (2001, 2007) that Putnam is largely immune to metamathematical challenges

Author's Profile

Tim Button
University College London

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-02-17

Downloads
756 (#28,369)

6 months
241 (#8,738)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?