Displaced Workers: America's Unpaid Debt

Journal of Business Ethics 4 (1):31 - 41 (1985)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The U.S. doctrine of employment-at-will, modified legislatively for protected groups, is being less harshly applied to managerial personnel. Comparable compensation is not otherwise available in the U.S. to workers displaced by technology. Nine pairs of arguments are presented to show how fundamentally management and labor disagree about a company's responsibility for its former employees. These arguments, born of years of labor-management debate, are kaleidoscopic claims about which side has what power. Ultimately, however, not even both together can solve without creative public intervention the emerging problem of massive technological unemployment — the other side of the corporate dream of profit without payrolls. (Originally published as "Displaced Workers: Whose Responsibility?" in Social Policy and Conflict Resolution, eds. T. Attig, D. Callen, and R.G. Frey, Bowling Green, OH: Bowling Green Studies in Applied Philosophy VI, 1984.)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2017-08-19
Latest version: 2 (2017-09-30)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
68 ( #51,045 of 2,448,892 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #61,297 of 2,448,892 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.