Signals that make a Difference

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Recent work by Brian Skyrms offers a very general way to think about how information flows and evolves in biological networks — from the way monkeys in a troop communicate, to the way cells in a body coordinate their actions. A central feature of his account is a way to formally measure the quantity of information contained in the signals in these networks. In this paper, we argue there is a tension between how Skyrms talks of signalling networks and his formal measure of information. Although Skyrms refers to both how information flows through networks and that signals carry information, we show that his formal measure only captures the latter. We then suggest that to capture the notion of flow in signalling networks, we need to treat them as causal networks. This provides the formal tools to define a measure that does capture flow, and we do so by drawing on recent work defining causal specificity. Finally, we suggest that this new measure is crucial if we wish to explain how evolution creates information. For signals to play a role in explaining their own origins and stability, they can’t just carry information about acts: they must be difference-makers for acts.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
Reprint years
2017
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CALSTM-3
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-03-23
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Causality.Pearl, Judea

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-12-02

Total views
52 ( #31,869 of 40,688 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #23,729 of 40,688 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.