Why Katz is Wrong: A Lab-Created Creature Can Still Have an Ancient Evolutionary History

Ethics, Policy and Environment:1-4 (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Katz denies that organisms created in a lab as part of a de-extinction attempt will be authentic members of the extinct species, on the basis that they will lack the original species’ defining biological and evolutionary history. Against Katz, I note that an evolutionary lineage is conferred on an organism through its inheriting genes from forebears already possessed of such a lineage, and that de-extinction amounts to a delayed, human-assisted reproductive process, in which genes are inherited from forebears long dead. My conclusion is that de-extinct organisms can perfectly well have an ancient evolutionary history, contrary to what Katz claims.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CAMWKI
Upload history
Archival date: 2022-05-09
View other versions
Added to PP index
2022-05-05

Total views
27 ( #66,857 of 69,002 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
27 ( #30,589 of 69,002 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.