Why Philosophers Shouldn’t Do Semantics

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The linguistic turn provided philosophers with a range of reasons for engaging in careful investigation into the nature and structure of language. However, the linguistic turn is dead. The arguments for it have been abandoned. This raises the question: why should philosophers take an interest in the minutiae of natural language semantics? I’ll argue that there isn’t much of a reason - philosophy of language has lost its way. Then I provide a suggestion for how it can find its way again.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2016-11-02
Latest version: 4 (2017-05-05)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
850 ( #5,577 of 2,439,025 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
53 ( #12,851 of 2,439,025 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.