Why Philosophers Shouldn’t Do Semantics

Review of Philosophy and Psychology 8 (4):743-762 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The linguistic turn provided philosophers with a range of reasons for engaging in careful investigation into the nature and structure of language. However, the linguistic turn is dead. The arguments for it have been abandoned. This raises the question: why should philosophers take an interest in the minutiae of natural language semantics? I’ll argue that there isn’t much of a reason - philosophy of language has lost its way. Then I provide a suggestion for how it can find its way again.


Added to PP

1,029 (#6,182)

6 months
76 (#10,337)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?