Contextualism, assessor relativism, and insensitive assessments

Logique Et Analyse 52 (208):363-372 (2009)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Recently, contextualism about epistemic modals and predicates of taste have come under fire from advocates of assessment relativistic analyses. Contextualism, they have argued, fails to account for what we call "felicitous insensitive assessments". In this paper, we provide one hitherto overlooked way in which contextualists can embrace the phenomenon by slightly modifying an assumption that has remained in the background in most of the debate over contextualism and relativism. Finally, we briefly argue that the resulting contextualist account is at least as plausible as the relativist alternative and should be carefully considered before contextualism is abandoned for relativism.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2012-12-13
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
496 ( #12,504 of 2,449,104 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #39,335 of 2,449,104 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.