Assertion and hypothesis: a logical framework for their opposition relations

Logic Journal of the IGPL 25 (2):131-144 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Following the speech act theory, we take hypotheses and assertions as linguistic acts with different illocutionary forces. We assume that a hypothesis is justified if there is at least a scintilla of evidence for the truth of its propositional content, while an assertion is justified when there is conclusive evidence that its propositional content is true. Here we extend the logical treatment for assertions given by Dalla Pozza and Garola by outlining a pragmatic logic for assertions and hypotheses. On the basis of this extension we analyse the standard logical opposition relations for assertions and hypotheses. We formulate a pragmatic square of oppositions for assertions and a hexagon of oppositions for hypotheses. Finally, we give a mixed hexagon of oppositions to point out the opposition relations for assertions and hypotheses.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CARAAH-8
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-12-28
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Foundations of Illocutionary Logic.Searle, John R. & Vanderveken, Daniel

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Abductive Inference Within a Pragmatic Framework.Chiffi, Daniele & Pietarinen, Ahti-Veikko
Assertive Graphs.Bellucci, F.; Chiffi, D. & Pietarinen, A.-V.
Pragmatic Logics for Hypotheses and Evidence.Carrara, Massimiliano; Chiffi, Daniele & De Florio, Ciro
On Assertion and Denial in the Logic for Pragmatics.Carrara, Massimiliano; Chiffi, Daniele & De Florio, Ciro

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-01-06

Total views
161 ( #23,623 of 47,120 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
75 ( #8,928 of 47,120 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.