A new maneuver against the epistemic relativist

Synthese 191 (8) (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Epistemic relativists often appeal to an epistemic incommensurability thesis. One notable example is the position advanced by Wittgenstein in On certainty (1969). However, Ian Hacking’s radical denial of the possibility of objective epistemic reasons for belief poses, we suggest, an even more forceful challenge to mainstream meta-epistemology. Our central objective will be to develop a novel strategy for defusing Hacking’s line of argument. Specifically, we show that the epistemic incommensurability thesis can be resisted even if we grant the very insights that lead Hacking to claim that epistemic reasons are always relative to a style of reasoning. Surprisingly, the key to defusing the argument is to be found in recent mainstream work on the epistemic state of objectual understanding
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2013-10-04
Latest version: 2 (2013-10-04)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Epistemic Luck.Pritchard, Duncan
Thinking How to Live.Gibbard, Allan

View all 70 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Perceptual Knowledge and Relevant Alternatives.Carter, J. Adam & Pritchard, Duncan

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
879 ( #2,605 of 42,931 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
81 ( #6,614 of 42,931 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.