Good Questions

In Jeffrey Dunn & Kristoffer Ahlstrom-Vij (eds.), Epistemic Consequentialism. Oxford, UK: pp. 123-145 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Pérez Carballo adopts an epistemic utility theory picture of epistemic norms where epistemic utility functions measure the value of degrees of belief, and rationality consists in maximizing expected epistemic utility. Within this framework he seeks to show that we can make sense of the intuitive idea that some true beliefs—say true beliefs about botany—are more valuable than other true beliefs—say true beliefs about the precise number of plants in North Dakota. To do so, however, Pérez Carballo argues that we must think of the value of epistemic states as consisting in more than simply accuracy. This sheds light on which questions it is most epistemically valuable to pursue.
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CARGQ
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-09-09
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Doxastic Deliberation.Shah, Nishi & David Velleman, J.

View all 30 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2018-10-18

Total views
7 ( #42,913 of 42,330 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #40,433 of 42,330 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.