How to Solve the Puzzle of Dion and Theon Without Losing Your Head

Mind:fzy021 (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The ancient puzzle of Dion and Theon has given rise to a surprising array of apparently implausible views. For example, in order to solve the puzzle, several philosophers have been led to deny the existence of their own feet, others have denied that objects can gain and lose parts, and large numbers of philosophers have embraced the thesis that distinct objects can occupy the same space, having all their material parts in common. In this paper, I argue for an alternative approach: I claim that human beings have ordinary parts—hands, heads, feet, and so on—but no extraordinary parts, such as ‘foot-complements’, the existence of which is essential to the puzzle. I rebut three objections to this approach: an objection that it is unacceptably metaphysically arbitrary, an objection that the view is incompatible with versions of the puzzle involving decapitation, and an objection concerning masses of matter. If we can believe that there are such things as hands and feet without involving ourselves in paradox, and without accepting large numbers of co-located material objects that share all their material parts, then that is what we should do. My view is the only known alternative which allows this.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2018-05-25
Latest version: 11 (2018-07-30)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Four Dimensionalism.Sider, Theodore
Objects and Persons.Merricks, Trenton
How Things Persist.Hawley, Katherine

View all 81 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
231 ( #13,602 of 40,775 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
66 ( #8,026 of 40,775 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.