Knowledge‐How and Cognitive Achievement

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
According to reductive intellectualism, knowledge-how just is a kind of propositional knowledge (e.g., Stanley & Williamson 2001; Stanley 2011a, 2011b; Brogaard, 2008a, 2008b, 2009, 2011, 2009, 2011). This proposal has proved controversial because knowledge-how and propositional knowledge do not seem to share the same epistemic properties, particularly with regard to epistemic luck. Here we aim to move the argument forward by offering a positive account of knowledge-how. In particular, we propose a new kind of anti-intellectualism. Unlike neo-Rylean anti-intellectualist views, according to which the possession of knowledge-how is just a matter of possessing certain abilities, we submit that knowledge-how is a particular kind of cognitive achievement attained just when cognitive ability is connected in the right way with successful performance
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2014-01-16
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Knowledge and its Limits.Williamson, Timothy
Epistemic Luck.Pritchard, Duncan
.Williamson, Timothy

View all 48 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Knowledge‐How and Epistemic Luck.Carter, J. Adam & Pritchard, Duncan
The Defeasibility of Knowledge-How.Carter, J. Adam & Navarro, Jesús
Extended Knowledge-How.Carter, J. Adam & Czarnecki, Bolesław

View all 19 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
621 ( #4,391 of 43,016 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
65 ( #9,299 of 43,016 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.