On the Infinite in Mereology with Plural Quantification

Review of Symbolic Logic 4 (1):54-62 (2011)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In Lewis reconstructs set theory using mereology and plural quantification (MPQ). In his recontruction he assumes from the beginning that there is an infinite plurality of atoms, whose size is equivalent to that of the set theoretical universe. Since this assumption is far beyond the basic axioms of mereology, it might seem that MPQ do not play any role in order to guarantee the existence of a large infinity of objects. However, we intend to demonstrate that mereology and plural quantification are, in some ways, particularly relevant to a certain conception of the infinite. More precisely, though the principles of mereology and plural quantification do not guarantee the existence of an infinite number of objects, nevertheless, once the existence of any infinite object is admitted, they are able to assure the existence of an uncountable infinity of objects. So, ifMPQ were parts of logic, the implausible consequence would follow that, given a countable infinity of individuals, logic would be able to guarantee an uncountable infinity of objects
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2017-11-22
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Parts: A Study in Ontology.Peter Simons - 1987 - Oxford University Press.
Parts of Classes.Lewis, David K.
Parts of Classes.LEWIS, David
Parts of Classes.LEWIS, David

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Grounding Megethology on Plural Reference.Carrara, Massimiliano & Martino, Enrico

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
211 ( #15,200 of 41,623 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
82 ( #6,177 of 41,623 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.