On the Meaning of 'Therefore'

Analysis 77 (1):88-97 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
I argue for an analysis of ‘therefore’ as presupposition trigger against the more standard conventional implicature story originally put forward by Grice (1975). I propose that we model the relevant presupposition as “testing” the context in a way that is similar to how, according to some dynamic treatments of epistemic `must', ‘must’ tests the context. But whereas the presupposition analysis is plausible for ‘therefore’, ‘must’ is not plausibly a presupposition trigger. Moreover, whereas ‘must’ can naturally occur under a supposition, the same is not true for ‘therefore’. In the light of these differences, I suggest we distinguish between different sorts of tests on the basis of the mechanisms whereby these expressions test the context (whether through a presupposition or through their core content) and on the basis of whether they can operate only on categorical contexts or on both categorical and hypothetical contexts.
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2017-01-23
Latest version: 4 (2017-04-08)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Epistemic Modals.Seth Yalcin - 2007 - Mind 116 (464):983-1026.

View all 22 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
258 ( #16,925 of 48,990 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
25 ( #26,970 of 48,990 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.