On the Meaning of 'Therefore'

Analysis 77 (1):88-97 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
I argue for an analysis of ‘therefore’ as presupposition trigger against the more standard conventional implicature story originally put forward by Grice (1975). I propose that we model the relevant presupposition as “testing” the context in a way that is similar to how, according to some dynamic treatments of epistemic `must', ‘must’ tests the context. But whereas the presupposition analysis is plausible for ‘therefore’, ‘must’ is not plausibly a presupposition trigger. Moreover, whereas ‘must’ can naturally occur under a supposition, the same is not true for ‘therefore’. In the light of these differences, I suggest we distinguish between different sorts of tests on the basis of the mechanisms whereby these expressions test the context (whether through a presupposition or through their core content) and on the basis of whether they can operate only on categorical contexts or on both categorical and hypothetical contexts.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CAROTM-5
Revision history
First archival date: 2017-01-23
Latest version: 4 (2017-04-08)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Epistemic Modals.Seth Yalcin - 2007 - Mind 116 (464):983-1026.

View all 20 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2017-01-23

Total views
219 ( #15,642 of 43,016 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
33 ( #20,035 of 43,016 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.