Plutarch's Epicurean Justification of Religious Belief

Journal of the History of Philosophy 56 (3):385-412 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
In his dialogue, 'Non posse suaviter vivi secundum Epicurum', Plutarch of Chaeronea criticizes Epicurus for not believing that the gods are provident over human affairs and for not believing that our souls survive death. However, Plutarch’s arguments are striking in that they do not offer any theoretical justification for believing either of these religious claims to be true; rather, they aim to establish that we are practically justified in adopting them if we follow Epicurus’s rule that the goal of belief is not truth in its own right, but mental tranquility. I argue that this form of argument assumes a novel justificatory theory of religious belief, based in Epicurean thought, that I call ‘strong doxastic hedonism.’
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-08-18
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
216 ( #30,471 of 2,462,744 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
44 ( #19,567 of 2,462,744 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.