Regarding a Regress

Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 94 (3):358-388 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Is there a successful regress argument against intellectualism? In this article I defend the negative answer. I begin by defending Stanley and Williamson's (2001) critique of the contemplation regress against Noë (2005). I then identify a new argument – the employment regress – that is designed to succeed where the contemplation regress fails, and which I take to be the most basic and plausible form of a regress argument against intellectualism. However, I argue that the employment regress still fails. Drawing on the previous discussion, I criticise further regress arguments given by Hetherington (2006) and Noë (2005)
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CATRAR
Upload history
Archival date: 2013-11-29
View other versions
Added to PP index
2011-10-21

Total views
510 ( #10,270 of 58,204 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
23 ( #31,537 of 58,204 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.