Liberal Democratic Institutions and the Damages of Political Corruption

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This article contributes to the debate concerning the identification of politically relevant cases of corruption in a democracy by sketching the basic traits of an original liberal theory of institutional corruption. We define this form of corruption as a deviation with respect to the role entrusted to people occupying certain institutional positions, which are crucial for the implementation of public rules, for private gain. In order to illustrate the damages that corrupt behaviour makes to liberal democratic institutions, we discuss the case of health care professionals’ abuse of their right to conscientious objection to abortion services. We show that the conscience clause can be instrumentally abused to sabotage democratically established public rules and thus exert undue private influence on their implementation. In this sense, from a liberal democratic perspective, institutional corruption is problematic because it is disruptive of such fundamental liberal ideals as the impartiality of public institutions and citizens’ political equality.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CEVLDI
Upload history
Archival date: 2014-07-07
View other versions
Added to PP index
2014-04-25

Total views
179 ( #34,580 of 65,546 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
8 ( #57,627 of 65,546 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.