Alien Worlds, Alien Laws, and the Humean Conceivability Argument

Ratio (forthcoming)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Monism is our name for a range of views according to which the connection between dispositions and their categorical bases is intimate and necessary, or on which there are no categorical bases at all. In contrast, Dualist views hold that the connection between dispositions and their categorical bases is distant and contingent. This paper is a defence of Monism against an influential conceivability argument in favour of Dualism. The argument suggests that the apparent possibility of causal behaviour coming apart from categorical bases is best explained by Dualism. We argue that Monism can explain the apparent possibility as well, if we take metaphysically alien laws — namely, laws whose metaphysical nature is alien to the actual world — into account.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CHAAWA-4
Revision history
Archival date: 2019-08-11
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Causality and Properties.Shoemaker, Sydney

View all 23 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2019-08-10

Total views
17 ( #39,932 of 41,546 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
17 ( #28,337 of 41,546 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.