Color in a Material World: Margaret Cavendish against the Early Modern Mechanists

Philosophical Review 128 (3):293-336 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Consider the distinctive qualitative property grass visually appears to have when it visually appears to be green. This property is an example of what I call sensuous color. Whereas early modern mechanists typically argue that bodies are not sensuously colored, Margaret Cavendish disagrees. In cases of veridical perception, she holds that grass is green in precisely the way it visually appears to be. In defense of her realist approach to sensuous colors, Cavendish argues that it is impossible to conceive of colorless bodies, the very possibility of color experience requires that bodies are sensuously colored, and the attribution of sensuous colors to bodies provides the best explanation of color constancy. Although some passages might suggest that Cavendish endorses a reductive account of sensuous color, according to which sensuous color reduces to a body's microscopic surface texture, I argue that she accepts a nonreductive account, on which sensuous color is not thus reducible.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-10-09
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
425 ( #15,520 of 64,109 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
87 ( #7,315 of 64,109 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.