Conditional preferences and practical conditionals

Linguistics and Philosophy 36 (6):463-511 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
I argue that taking the Practical Conditionals Thesis seriously demands a new understanding of the semantics of such conditionals. Practical Conditionals Thesis: A practical conditional [if A][ought] expresses B’s conditional preferability given A Paul Weirich has argued that the conditional utility of a state of affairs B on A is to be identified as the degree to which it is desired under indicative supposition that A. Similarly, exploiting the PCT, I will argue that the proper analysis of indicative practical conditionals is in terms of what is planned, desired, or preferred, given suppositional changes to an agent’s information. Implementing such a conception of conditional preference in a semantic analysis of indicative practical conditionals turns out to be incompatible with any approach which treats the indicative conditional as expressing non-vacuous universal quantification over some domain of relevant antecedent-possibilities. Such analyses, I argue, encode a fundamental misunderstanding of what it is to be best, given some condition. The analysis that does the best vis-à-vis the PCT is, instead, one that blends a Context-Shifty account of indicative antecedents with an Expressivistic, or non-propositional, treatment of their practical consequents
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2014-01-28
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Counterfactuals.Lewis, David K.
Thinking How to Live.Gibbard, Allan

View all 45 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
358 ( #11,443 of 47,366 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
31 ( #24,766 of 47,366 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.