Causal Powers, Hume’s Early German Critics, and Kant’s Response to Hume

Kant-Studien 104 (2):213-236 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Eric Watkins has argued on philosophical, textual, and historical grounds that Kant’s account of causation in the first Critique should not be read as an attempt to refute Hume’s account of causation. In this paper, I challenge the arguments for Watkins’ claim. Specifically, I argue (1) that Kant’s philosophical commitments, even on Watkins’ reading, are not obvious obstacles to refuting Hume, (2) that textual evidence from the “Disciple of Pure Reason” suggests Kant conceived of his account of causation as such a refutation, and (3) that none of Hume’s early German critics provided responses to this account that would have satisfied Kant. Watkins’ reading of Kant’s account of causation is thus more compatible with traditional views about Kant’s relationship to Hume than Watkins believes.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2016-06-11
Latest version: 2 (2016-06-12)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Notes and Fragments.Kant, Immanuel

View all 27 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
688 ( #5,205 of 50,077 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
233 ( #1,621 of 50,077 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.