Decision Theory: Yes! Truth Conditions: No!

In Nate Charlow Matthew Chrisman (ed.), Deontic Modality. Oxford University Press (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This essay makes the case for, in the phrase of Angelika Kratzer, packing the fruits of the study of rational decision-making into our semantics for deontic modals—specifically, for parametrizing the truth-condition of a deontic modal to things like decision problems and decision theories. Then it knocks it down. While the fundamental relation of the semantic theory must relate deontic modals to things like decision problems and theories, this semantic relation cannot be intelligibly understood as representing the conditions under which a deontic modal is true. Rather it represents the conditions under which it is accepted by a semantically competent agent. This in turn motivates a reorientation of the whole of semantic theorizing, away from the truth-conditional paradigm, toward a form of Expressivism.
Categories
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CHADTY
Revision history
First archival date: 2014-09-09
Latest version: 5 (2016-05-28)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Assertion and Modality.Cariani, Fabrizio

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2014-09-09

Total views
612 ( #3,987 of 40,775 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
78 ( #6,326 of 40,775 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.