Logical refutation of the EPR argument

Physics Essays 26:21-23 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

On the grounds that the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen argument is an example of reasoning by reductio ad absurdum, and that a counterexample is unacceptable, unless all its elements meet all the necessary conditions, its conclusions are invalidated. The arguments in this paper are strictly logical. Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen made a mathematical assumption that is incompatible with quantum mechanics.

Author's Profile

Oscar Chavoya Aceves
Glendale Community College

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
713 (#11,522)

6 months
15 (#64,384)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?