Logical refutation of the EPR argument

Physics Essays 26:21-23 (2013)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
On the grounds that the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen argument is an example of reasoning by reductio ad absurdum, and that a counterexample is unacceptable, unless all its elements meet all the necessary conditions, its conclusions are invalidated. The arguments in this paper are strictly logical. Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen made a mathematical assumption that is incompatible with quantum mechanics.
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2013-10-05
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
656 ( #5,770 of 51,646 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #50,953 of 51,646 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.