Option ranges

Journal of Applied Philosophy 18 (2):107–118 (2001)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
An option range is a set of alternative actions available to an agent at a given time. I ask how a moral theory’s account of option ranges relates to its recommendations about deliberative procedure (DP) and criterion of rightness (CR). I apply this question to Act Consequentialism (AC), which tells us, at any time, to perform the action with the best consequences in our option range then. If anyone can employ this command as a DP, or assess (direct or indirect) compliance with it as a CR, someone must be able to tell which actions fit this description. Since the denseness of possibilia entails that any option range is indefinitely large, no one can do this. So no one can know that any option has ever emerged from any range as the best option in that range. However we come to know that a given option is right, we never come to know it in AC’s way. It is often observed that AC cannot give us a DP. AC cannot give us a CR either, unless we are omniscient. So Act Consequentialism is useless
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CHAOR
Revision history
First archival date: 2018-05-12
Latest version: 2 (2018-05-12)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
151 ( #16,772 of 38,041 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
77 ( #4,569 of 38,041 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.