Our Fundamental Physical Space: An Essay on the Metaphysics of the Wave Function

Journal of Philosophy 114 (7):333-365 (2017)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
The mathematical structure of realist quantum theories has given rise to a debate about how our ordinary 3-dimensional space is related to the 3N-dimensional configuration space on which the wave function is defined. Which of the two spaces is our (more) fundamental physical space? I review the debate between 3N-Fundamentalists and 3D-Fundamentalists and evaluate it based on three criteria. I argue that when we consider which view leads to a deeper understanding of the physical world, especially given the deeper topological explanation from the unordered configurations to the Symmetrization Postulate, we have strong reasons in favor of 3D-Fundamentalism. I conclude that our evidence favors the view that our fundamental physical space in a quantum world is 3-dimensional rather than 3N-dimensional. I outline lines of future research where the evidential balance can be restored or reversed. Finally, I draw lessons from this case study to the debate about theoretical equivalence.
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
First archival date: 2017-07-13
Latest version: 2 (2017-10-24)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Wave-Function as a Multi-Field.Hubert, Mario & Romano, Davide

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total views
317 ( #13,745 of 48,876 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
37 ( #18,988 of 48,876 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.