Balint’s Syndrome, Visual Motion Perception, and Awareness of Space

Erkenntnis 83 (6):1265-1284 (2018)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Kant, Wittgenstein, and Husserl all held that visual awareness of objects requires visual awareness of the space in which the objects are located. There is a lively debate in the literature on spatial perception whether this view is undermined by the results of experiments on a Balint’s syndrome patient, known as RM. I argue that neither of two recent interpretations of these results is able to explain RM’s apparent ability to experience motion. I outline some ways in which each interpretation may respond to this challenge, and suggest which way of meeting the challenge is preferable. I conclude that RM retains some awareness of the larger space surrounding the objects he sees.
No keywords specified (fix it)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2020-11-24
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
136 ( #39,553 of 64,215 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
28 ( #25,676 of 64,215 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.