Cruelty, competency, and contemporary abolitionism

In A. Sarat (ed.), Studies in Law, Politics, and Society. pp. 123-140 (2005)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
After establishing that the requirement that those criminals who stand for execution be mentally competent can be given a recognizably retributivist rationale, I suggest that not only it is difficult to show that executing the incompetent is more cruel than executing the competent, but that opposing the execution of the incompetent fits ill with the recent abolitionist efforts on procedural concerns. I then propose two avenues by which abolitionists could incorporate such opposition into their efforts.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2014-02-10
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
280 ( #23,737 of 64,055 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
39 ( #19,800 of 64,055 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.