Regret, Resilience, and the Nature of Grief

Journal of Moral Philosophy 16 (4):486-508 (2019)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Should we regret the fact that we are often more emotionally resilient in response to the deaths of our loved ones than we might expect -- that the suffering associated with grief often dissipates more quickly and more fully than we anticipate? Dan Moller ("Love and Death") argues that we should, because this resilience epistemically severs us from our loved ones and thereby "deprives us of insight into our own condition." I argue that Moller's conclusion is correct despite resting on a mistaken picture of the nature and significance of grief. Unlike Moller, I contend that grief is a composite emotional process, rather than a single mental state; that grief is a species of emotional attention rather than perception; and that grief is a form of activity directed at placing our relationships with the deceased on new terms. It is precisely because grief has these three features that it facilitates the scrutiny of our practical identities and thus fosters self-knowledge and self-understanding.
Keywords
Reprint years
2019
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CHORRA-2
Upload history
Archival date: 2019-02-11
View other versions
Added to PP index
2018-10-30

Total views
607 ( #9,987 of 64,252 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
115 ( #5,039 of 64,252 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.