Attitudinal Expressivism and Logical Pragmatism

In Graham Hubbs & Douglas Lind (eds.), Pragmatism, Law, and Language. pp. 117-135 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
Contemporary discussions of expressivism in metaethics tend to run together two quite different antidescriptivist views, and only one of them is subject to the objection about compositional semantics pressed most recently by Schroeder (following Dreier, Unwinn, Hale, Geach and others). Here I distinguish the two versions of expressivism and then go on to suggest that those sympathetic to the second sort of expressivism might improve their account of normative vocabulary and the way it figures in reasoning by making what may seem like a somewhat surprising comparison between normative vocabulary and logical vocabulary. I argue that this comparison brings into view the initial steps towards a third antidescriptivist view in metaethics, which we may see as a pragmatist improvement on the second version of expressivism.
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CHRAEA
Revision history
Archival date: 2015-07-27
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2015-07-27

Total views
152 ( #17,357 of 39,000 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #25,795 of 39,000 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.