Diachronic coherence versus epistemic impartiality

Philosophical Review 109 (3):349-371 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

It is obvious that we would not want to demand that an agent' s beliefs at different times exhibit the same sort of consistency that we demand from an agent' s simultaneous beliefs; there' s nothing irrational about believing P at one time and not-P at another. Nevertheless, many have thought that some sort of coherence or stability of beliefs over time is an important component of epistemic rationality.

Author's Profile

David Christensen
Brown University

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
801 (#17,972)

6 months
109 (#37,543)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?