Disagreement, Drugs, etc.: from Accuracy to Akrasia

Episteme 13 (4):397-422 (2016)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
We often get evidence concerning the reliability of our own thinking about some particular matter. This “higher-order evidence” can come from the disagreement of others, or from information about our being subject to the effects of drugs, fatigue, emotional ties, implicit biases, etc. This paper examines some pros and cons of two fairly general models for accommodating higher-order evidence. The one that currently seems most promising also turns out to have the consequence that epistemic akrasia should occur more frequently than is sometimes supposed. But it also helps us see why this might not be a bad thing.
Reprint years
2016
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CHRDDE
Revision history
First archival date: 2016-03-12
Latest version: 3 (2016-06-09)
View upload history
References found in this work BETA
Higher Order Evidence.Christensen, David

View all 22 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Disagreement.Matheson, Jonathan & Frances, Bryan

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index
2016-03-12

Total views
330 ( #9,906 of 42,375 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
64 ( #9,380 of 42,375 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.