Embracing Epistemic Dilemmas

In Epistemic Dilemmas: New Arguments, New Angles (2021)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
This paper concentrates on a particular sort of case where it’s plausible that epistemic requirements can conflict: cases where an agent’s higher-order evidence supports doubting her reliability in reacting to her ordinary evidence. Conflicting epistemic requirements can be seen as generating epistemic dilemmas. The paper examines two ways that people have sought to recognize conflicting requirements without allowing them to generate epistemic dilemmas: separating epistemic norms into two different varieties, and positing rational indeterminacy in cases where principles conflict. It argues that these views incur costs, and that the sense in which they avoid dilemmas does not gain them an advantage over a view that simply recognizes dilemmas as a natural outgrowth of agents’ rational reflection on their own thinking.
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
Archival date: 2022-04-18
View other versions
Added to PP

95 (#54,696)

6 months
95 (#7,214)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?