What is relative confirmation?

Noûs 31 (3):370-384 (1997)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
It is commonly acknowledged that, in order to test a theoretical hypothesis, one must, in Duhem' s phrase, rely on a "theoretical scaffolding" to connect the hypothesis with something measurable. Hypothesis-confirmation, on this view, becomes a three-place relation: evidence E will confirm hypothesis H only relative to some such scaffolding B. Thus the two leading logical approaches to qualitative confirmation--the hypothetico-deductive (H-D) account and Clark Glymour' s bootstrap account--analyze confirmation in relative terms. But this raises questions about the philosophical interpretation of the technical conditions these accounts describe. What does it mean to say that E confirms H "relative to B"? How should we interpret the relation we are trying to analyze?
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CHRWIR
Upload history
Archival date: 2021-08-13
View other versions
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
117 ( #43,785 of 65,558 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #46,033 of 65,558 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.