Formulating Consciousness: A Comparative Analysis of Searle’s and Dennett’s Theory of Consciousness

Talisik Undergraduate Journal of Philosophy 4 (1):43-58 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This research will argue about which theory of mind between Searle’s and Dennett’s can better explain human consciousness. Initially, distinctions between dualism and materialism will be discussed ranging from substance dualism, property dualism, physicalism, and functionalism. In this part, the main issue that is tackled in various theories of mind is revealed. It is the missing connection between input stimulus (neuronal reactions) and behavioral disposition: consciousness. Then, the discussion will be more specific on Searle’s biological naturalism and Dennett’s multiple drafts model as the two attempted to answer the issue. The differences between them will be highlighted and will be analyzed according to their relation to their roots: dualism and materialism. The two theories will be examined on how each answer the questions on consciousness.

Author's Profile

John Chua
University of the Philippines, Diliman

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-12-17

Downloads
2,604 (#2,812)

6 months
490 (#2,980)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?