Dreams, Nightmares, and a Defense against Arguments From Evil

Faith and Philosophy 32 (3):247-270 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper appeals to the phenomenon of dreaming to provide a novel defense against arguments from evil. The thrust of the argument is as follows: when we wake up after a nightmare we are often filled entirely with relief, and do not consider ourselves to have actually suffered very much at all; and since it is epistemically possible that this whole life is simply a dream, it follows that it is epistemically possible that in reality there is very little suffering. This epistemic possibility decisively undermines a key premise of both logical and evidential arguments from evil.

Author's Profile

Gabriel Citron
Princeton University

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-07-08

Downloads
1,542 (#9,152)

6 months
191 (#14,288)

Historical graph of downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.
How can I increase my downloads?