Can the Berkeleyan Idealist Resist Spinozist Panpsychism?

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
We argue that prevailing definitions of Berkeley’s idealism fail to rule out a nearby Spinozist rival view that we call ‘mind-body identity panpsychism.’ Since Berkeley certainly does not agree with Spinoza on this issue, we call for more care in defining Berkeley’s view. After we propose our own definition of Berkeley’s idealism, we survey two Berkeleyan strategies to block the mind-body identity panpsychist and establish his idealism. We argue that Berkeley should follow Leibniz and further develop his account of the mind’s unity. Unity—not activity—is the best way for Berkeley to establish his view at the expense of his panpsychist competitors.
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CLACTB-6
Upload history
First archival date: 2019-10-29
Latest version: 2 (2019-11-22)
View other versions
Added to PP index
2019-10-29

Total views
236 ( #21,204 of 54,561 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
116 ( #4,485 of 54,561 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.