Hans Jonas' Feeble Theodicy: How on Earth Could God Retire?

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this paper, we criticize Hans Jonas’s analogy between God’s power and the operation of physical forces. We wonder why, if omnipotence had proved to be "a self-contradictory concept", does Jonas still need to invoke the occurrence of horrendous evils to support the view that "God is not all powerful". We suggest that "God’s retreating into himself in order to give room to the world, renouncing his being and divesting himself of his deity" are beautiful but inconsistent metaphors of creation. Our central claim is that God’s alleged retirement, even if it were conceivable, would not the least diminish his responsibility in the occurrence of evil
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CLAHJF
Revision history
Archival date: 2018-03-14
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Added to PP index
2012-06-02

Total views
195 ( #15,772 of 40,652 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
70 ( #7,290 of 40,652 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.