Hans Jonas' Feeble Theodicy: How on Earth Could God Retire?

Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
In this paper, we criticize Hans Jonas’s analogy between God’s power and the operation of physical forces. We wonder why, if omnipotence had proved to be "a self-contradictory concept", does Jonas still need to invoke the occurrence of horrendous evils to support the view that "God is not all powerful". We suggest that "God’s retreating into himself in order to give room to the world, renouncing his being and divesting himself of his deity" are beautiful but inconsistent metaphors of creation. Our central claim is that God’s alleged retirement, even if it were conceivable, would not the least diminish his responsibility in the occurrence of evil
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CLAHJF
Upload history
Archival date: 2018-03-14
View other versions
Added to PP index
2012-06-02

Total views
422 ( #13,048 of 58,283 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
81 ( #8,106 of 58,283 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.