Neuroeconomics and Confirmation Theory

Philosophy of Science 81 (2):195-215 (2014)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Neuroeconomics is a research programme founded on the thesis that cognitive and neurobiological data constitute evidence for answering economic questions. I employ confirmation theory in order to reject arguments both for and against neuroeconomics. I also emphasize that some arguments for neuroeconomics will not convince the skeptics because these arguments make a contentious assumption: economics aims for predictions and deep explanations of choices in general. I then argue for neuroeconomics by appealing to a much more restrictive (and thereby skeptic-friendly) characterization of the aims of economics.
Reprint years
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Upload history
First archival date: 2013-11-01
Latest version: 3 (2017-11-23)
View other versions
Added to PP index

Total views
830 ( #4,221 of 52,662 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
40 ( #15,569 of 52,662 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.