Plant Individuality and Multilevel Selection Theory

In Kim Sterelny & Brett Calcott (eds.), The Major Transitions Revisited. MIT Press. pp. 227--250 (2011)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Abstract
This chapter develops the idea that the germ-soma split and the suppression of individual fitness differences within the corporate entity are not always essential steps in the evolution of corporate individuals. It illustrates some consequences for multilevel selection theory. It presents evidence that genetic heterogeneity may not always be a barrier to successful functioning as a higher-level individual. This chapter shows that levels-of-selection theorists are wrong to assume that the central problem in transitions is always that of minimizing within-group competition. Evidence of intralevel conflict does not qualify as evidence against the existence of a higher level of selection.
Keywords
No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories
(categorize this paper)
Reprint years
2013
PhilPapers/Archive ID
CLAPIA-4
Upload history
Archival date: 2011-06-08
View other versions
Added to PP index
2011-04-20

Total views
985 ( #5,195 of 65,651 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
45 ( #19,101 of 65,651 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks on external links on PhilPapers.