The two-envelope paradox

Mind 109 (435):415--442 (2000)
Download Edit this record How to cite View on PhilPapers
Previous claims to have resolved the two-envelope paradox have been premature. The paradoxical argument has been exposed as manifestly fallacious if there is an upper limit to the amount of money that may be put in an envelope; but the paradoxical cases which can be described if this limitation is removed do not involve mathematical error, nor can they be explained away in terms of the strangeness of infinity. Only by taking account of the partial sums of the infinite series of expected gains can the paradox be resolved.
No keywords specified (fix it)
(categorize this paper)
PhilPapers/Archive ID
Revision history
Archival date: 2013-07-30
View upload history
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Two Envelopes and Binding.Hansen, Casper Storm

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Added to PP index

Total downloads
450 ( #4,817 of 36,564 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #21,224 of 36,564 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads since first upload
This graph includes both downloads from PhilArchive and clicks to external links.